If you’ve worked with a recruitment process outsourcing (RPO) firm before, you probably remember the kickoff call more fondly than the results. The deck was polished, and they hit every target in the contract. But after a few months, 20 out of the 30 new hires were already gone.
RPO is a form of business process outsourcing, and it’s the distant cousin of the staffing agency. Both rent you recruiting muscle when your own team can’t keep up. The agency hands over candidates and keeps the process. The RPO provider moves into your systems and reports against hiring targets you set together. Call it rent-a-recruiter. When your problem is too few recruiters, renting a few more fixes it. The scoreboard is where it gets tricky.
Most RPO engagements measure success by the number of hires they make.
For senior and specialized roles in sales, healthcare, IT, and other fields, RPO can work really well.
Those searches run for weeks. You have several interviews with a few candidates, and every hire is worth the courtship. A good RPO team builds those relationships for a living.
Frontline, high-volume hiring is a different world. You’re filling dozens or hundreds of seats a month. Candidates can find another job by Friday, and the roles you fill tend to be open again in a few months. Paying an outside team to keep refilling them becomes expensive fast.
Let’s run the math. Say you fill 100 frontline seats and lose 60 of them within 90 days. Your RPO provider hit its target, and your net capacity went up by 40. You’re still behind your goal, the people who stayed are covering extra shifts, and if you’re in a service industry, your wait list keeps growing.
Recruitment and retention are two halves of one problem, and the RPO model was built for the first half. Here’s what RPO covers, where it falls short, and why we take a different approach to frontline recruiting.Here’s what recruitment process outsourcing covers, where the model falls short, and why we take a different approach to frontline recruiting.